ISSN: 2161-0711

Общественная медицина и санитарное просвещение

Открытый доступ

Наша группа организует более 3000 глобальных конференций Ежегодные мероприятия в США, Европе и США. Азия при поддержке еще 1000 научных обществ и публикует более 700 Открытого доступа Журналы, в которых представлены более 50 000 выдающихся деятелей, авторитетных учёных, входящих в редколлегии.

 

Журналы открытого доступа набирают больше читателей и цитируемости
700 журналов и 15 000 000 читателей Каждый журнал получает более 25 000 читателей

Индексировано в
  • Индекс Коперника
  • Google Scholar
  • Шерпа Ромео
  • Генамика ЖурналSeek
  • БезопасностьЛит
  • РефСик
  • Университет Хамдарда
  • ЭБСКО, Аризона
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Публикации
  • Женевский фонд медицинского образования и исследований
  • Евро Паб
  • ICMJE
Поделиться этой страницей

Абстрактный

A Systematic Review on Evolving the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England: Targeted Screening for Individuals with First Degree Family History of Bowel Cancer

Rutendo L Chigonda

First degree relatives of bowel cancer cases have an approximately twofold risk of the disease compared with those without a family history, and the more affected first degree relatives an individual has, the higher the absolute and relative risk for developing bowel cancer. At present, widespread screening of average risk individuals for bowel cancer occurs in England; however, the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme does not currently provide a framework for the identification of a family history of bowel cancer. The aim is to determine the cost effectiveness and benefits of offering targeted screening to individuals with a first degree family history of bowel cancer. The primary outcomes examined the prevalence of developing bowel cancer and estimated the cost effectiveness to inform screening policy decisions. The secondary outcome evaluated the possible screening barriers in the adoption of bowel screening of first degree relatives. Data presented suggests that screening first degree relatives of patients with bowel cancer is likely to be cost effective to the NHS, and that compared with the average risk group using colonoscopy, advanced neoplasia was significantly more prevalent in those with first degree relatives with bowel cancer. Targeted screening would mean less long term health costs however, given the limited resources on NHS cost analysis data, cost savings associated with targeted screening are largely unknown; although data presented from European studies strongly suggests that it may be optimistic. Opportunities for this review include its recommendation to modify the screening criteria to extended to first degree relatives of bowel cancer patients and for the National Screening Committee to implement this protocol nationwide.

Отказ от ответственности: Этот реферат был переведен с помощью инструментов искусственного интеллекта и еще не прошел проверку или верификацию.