ISSN: 2161-0711

Общественная медицина и санитарное просвещение

Открытый доступ

Наша группа организует более 3000 глобальных конференций Ежегодные мероприятия в США, Европе и США. Азия при поддержке еще 1000 научных обществ и публикует более 700 Открытого доступа Журналы, в которых представлены более 50 000 выдающихся деятелей, авторитетных учёных, входящих в редколлегии.

 

Журналы открытого доступа набирают больше читателей и цитируемости
700 журналов и 15 000 000 читателей Каждый журнал получает более 25 000 читателей

Индексировано в
  • Индекс Коперника
  • Google Scholar
  • Шерпа Ромео
  • Генамика ЖурналSeek
  • БезопасностьЛит
  • РефСик
  • Университет Хамдарда
  • ЭБСКО, Аризона
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Публикации
  • Женевский фонд медицинского образования и исследований
  • Евро Паб
  • ICMJE
Поделиться этой страницей

Абстрактный

Associations between Healthcare Trust, Health Information Trust, and Barriers to Colorectal and Cervical Cancer Screening

Jayme Wood, Alain Kameni

Objective: Trust in the healthcare system and health information is an important determining factor for patient healthcare utilization. This study examines the relationships among healthcare trust, health information trust, and barriers to screening, and their association with receipt of cervical and colorectal cancer screening.
Methods: Women aged 45 years-65 years in central Pennsylvania completed a survey about cancer screening (n=474). We used chi square tests, bivariate and multivariable logistic regression, and moderation analysis to examine associations among healthcare trust, health information trust, barriers to screening, and being up to date with cervical cancer screening and with colorectal cancer screening.
Results: On average, participants were 55.1 years old. Being up to date with cervical and colorectal cancer screening was more common in participants with private insurance and those who had a check-up within the last year (all p<0.05). Cervical cancer screening was higher for participants with greater health information trust and fewer barriers (both p<0.05). Colorectal cancer screening was higher for participants with fewer barriers to screening (multivariable odds ratio [OR]=0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.35-0.82). There was no evidence of an interaction between barriers to screening and healthcare trust or health information trust with cervical cancer screening (p=0.70 and p=0.07, respectively) or colorectal cancer screening (p=0.59 andp=0.93, respectively).
Conclusion: Measures of trust did not moderate the relationship between barriers to screening and screening uptake, suggesting that interventions may directly impact screening behaviors by targeting either trust or barriers. The findings of this study can guide future interventions to promote cervical and colorectal cancer screening uptake.

Отказ от ответственности: Этот реферат был переведен с помощью инструментов искусственного интеллекта и еще не прошел проверку или верификацию.