ISSN: 2475-3173

Рак шейки матки: открытый доступ

Открытый доступ

Наша группа организует более 3000 глобальных конференций Ежегодные мероприятия в США, Европе и США. Азия при поддержке еще 1000 научных обществ и публикует более 700 Открытого доступа Журналы, в которых представлены более 50 000 выдающихся деятелей, авторитетных учёных, входящих в редколлегии.

 

Журналы открытого доступа набирают больше читателей и цитируемости
700 журналов и 15 000 000 читателей Каждый журнал получает более 25 000 читателей

Абстрактный

Factors Influencing uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in India: A Hospital based Pilot Study.

Sandeep Singh  

With an end goal to diminish the cost of cervical malignant growth, by its information, counteraction and treatment administrations in the network, we gave a nuanced thought of the sociological and anthropological understanding into the ladies' information and its relationship with that of financial segment profile over the span of understanding cervical symptomatology, screening and disease. Strategies: Study through an inside and out survey was led at JA Groups of Hospital's Obstetrics and Gynecology OPD, Gwalior, India on an aggregate of 812 ladies with a modular normal period of 35.51 ± 10.64 years, from June-August 2010. Results: We found a lot of need mindfulness and observation in Indian ladies. Shockingly all ladies introduced were hitched. Just 9.59% of ladies had ever known about cervical malignancy, for the most part having a place with upper financial gathering with just 11.62% experienced at any rate one cervical screening in their life time. None of them revealed careful motivation behind the Pap test. Male accomplice was the sole leader of the family in 47.20% ladies. 73.65% of the respondents were utilizing garments rather than tampons or clean cushions during feminine cycle. Conversation: This examination uncovered the constrained information on Indian ladies about the weakness of cervical malignant growth, and the need of cervical disease screening among the ladies. Insufficient general wellbeing instruction, absence of patientaccommodating wellbeing administrations, socio-social wellbeing convictions, and individual troubles were the most remarkable boundaries to screening.