ISSN: 2161-0681

Журнал клинической и экспериментальной патологии

Открытый доступ

Наша группа организует более 3000 глобальных конференций Ежегодные мероприятия в США, Европе и США. Азия при поддержке еще 1000 научных обществ и публикует более 700 Открытого доступа Журналы, в которых представлены более 50 000 выдающихся деятелей, авторитетных учёных, входящих в редколлегии.

 

Журналы открытого доступа набирают больше читателей и цитируемости
700 журналов и 15 000 000 читателей Каждый журнал получает более 25 000 читателей

Индексировано в
  • Индекс Коперника
  • Google Scholar
  • Шерпа Ромео
  • Открыть J-ворота
  • Генамика ЖурналSeek
  • ЖурналТОС
  • Справочник периодических изданий Ульриха
  • РефСик
  • Университет Хамдарда
  • ЭБСКО, Аризона
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Публикации
  • Женевский фонд медицинского образования и исследований
  • Евро Паб
  • ICMJE
Поделиться этой страницей

Абстрактный

Preliminary Study on the Significance of BRCA1 and PARP1 Immunohistochemical Expression in Ovarian Cancer

Leonardo Resta, Maria Arcangela Cascarano, Gennaro Cormio, Gian Franco Zannoni, Damiano Arciuolo, Gabriella Serio, and Andrea Marzullo1

Role of BRCA1 and PARP1 has been studied by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of ovarian cancers. Their expression has been related to overall survival and disease free disease.
Objective: To investigate the clinical outcome of an heterogeneous population of ovarian cancers as respect to immunohistochemical expression of BRCA1 and PARP1 in order to identify a histological threshold for positivity and negativity and to predict possible candidates to anti-PARP therapy
Material and methods: 97 cases of ovarian cancers were collected in a multicentre study and immunohistochemically tested for BRCA1 and PARP1. The immunohistochemical expression of BRCA1 and PARP1 was studied on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples. Overall survival and disease free survival were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed including cancers of all types and a subgroup of high grade serous carcinoma that represents the predominant histotype.
Results:
A possible threshold to discriminate positive and negative cases has been proposed. BRCA1 and PARP1 immunohistochemical expression did not significantly correlate with overall survival. The evaluation of survival for the combinations of BRCA1+/-, PARP1+/- showed a longer patient survival when the positivity and negativity were in contrast compared to when they were in agreement.
Conclusions: Although BRCA1 and PARP1 expression do not appear to be correlated with overall survival, further investigation and follow-up together with a larger number of cases could clarify the function; the standardised immunohistochemical method could better select the patient group sensitive to PARP1 inhibitors.