ISSN: 2167-0846

Журнал боли и облегчения

Открытый доступ

Наша группа организует более 3000 глобальных конференций Ежегодные мероприятия в США, Европе и США. Азия при поддержке еще 1000 научных обществ и публикует более 700 Открытого доступа Журналы, в которых представлены более 50 000 выдающихся деятелей, авторитетных учёных, входящих в редколлегии.

 

Журналы открытого доступа набирают больше читателей и цитируемости
700 журналов и 15 000 000 читателей Каждый журнал получает более 25 000 читателей

Индексировано в
  • Индекс Коперника
  • Google Scholar
  • Открыть J-ворота
  • Генамика ЖурналSeek
  • Космос ЕСЛИ
  • РефСик
  • Университет Хамдарда
  • ЭБСКО, Аризона
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Публикации
  • Женевский фонд медицинского образования и исследований
  • Евро Паб
  • ICMJE
Поделиться этой страницей

Абстрактный

Support of Acute Pain Therapy by Analgesia Nociception Index in Post Anesthesia Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nadine Hochhausen, Monica Ritter, Andreas Follmann, Henriette Dohmeier, Rolf Rossaint and Michae Czaplik

Objective: Postoperative pain management requires a well-directed pain therapy. Generally, the assessment of pain intensity depends on a self-evaluated numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 to 10). Recently, a pain monitor using a socalled “ANI” (analgesia nociception index; 100 to 0) was introduced. The higher the ANI, the lower the pain intensity is considered. The aim of this study was to investigate if the use of ANI improves acute pain therapy in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) by means of the experienced pain intensity (mean NRS) as the primary outcome parameter.
Methods: After admission to PACU, patients were randomly assigned to the “supported by technique” (TC) or the control group (CO). In both groups, self-assessment of pain intensity was requested every 15 minutes and pain therapy was provided according to internal clinical standards when the self-reported NRS by the patient exceeded 4. In the TC group, NRS pain score was additionally assessed when ANI fell below 50.
Results: Out of 91 collectively included patients, 46 were assigned to the TC group. The mean NRS did not differ between the groups (p=0.192) at discharge. However, suitability of the ANI monitor was strongly dependent from the individual patient. In some patients, a strong negative correlation was obtained, in other patients no correlation or, curiously, a strong positive correlation was observed.
Conclusion: Although objective pain intensity assessment would be beneficial for postoperative care, its measurement remains challenging.