Журнал ожирения и обмена веществ

Открытый доступ

Наша группа организует более 3000 глобальных конференций Ежегодные мероприятия в США, Европе и США. Азия при поддержке еще 1000 научных обществ и публикует более 700 Открытого доступа Журналы, в которых представлены более 50 000 выдающихся деятелей, авторитетных учёных, входящих в редколлегии.

 

Журналы открытого доступа набирают больше читателей и цитируемости
700 журналов и 15 000 000 читателей Каждый журнал получает более 25 000 читателей

Абстрактный

A Social Return on Investment Analysis of the Healthy Weights Initiative: 12-month Results for 1,401 Participants.

Lemstra ME and Rogers M

The Healthy Weights Initiative (HWI) is a free, complete stoutness decrease program inside two urban communities in the territory of Saskatchewan, Canada. The goal of the investigation was to direct a Social Return On Investment (SROI) examination on the HWI, which assesses the general monetary, social, and ecological estimation of an intercession. There are six phases to a SROI: 1) distinguish partners; 2) map intercession changes including information sources, yields, and results; 3) give results a money related intermediary; 4) represent different variables that can clarify the result and alter for drop-off; 5) figure the SROI; and 6) report the outcomes to a wide populace. From June 1, 2015 to January 31, 2018, 2,000 members finished the underlying 24-week HWI program. As of December 31, 2018, 1,401 HWI members (70.0%) consented to one-year development and the SROI overview. The review was additionally finished by 121 of 132 alluding doctors (91.7%). Generally speaking, 99.9% of HWI members accepted the watched results were worthy, 7.1% accepted the outcomes were perhaps because of another program in the city, 99.8% felt the program merited the cost, 71.3% demonstrated they would pay for such a program themselves, and 99% trusted some degree of government should back the program. Among alluding doctors, 98.3% accepted the watched results were adequate, 10.7% accepted the outcomes were perhaps because of another program in the city, 96.7% felt the program merited the cost, 53.7% demonstrated they would pay for such a program themselves, and 82.6% trusted some degree of government should back the program.